Skip to content
Fair Vision Smart

Advocacy Collective Asserts to Have Scraped Millions of Audio Files from Spotify

A digital rights organization has claimed to have scraped millions of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Industry experts noted the seeming data breach could aid AI companies looking for data to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and used questionable methods to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ rights, said the breached music would probably be used for developing AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for technology, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.

Written by

Brittany Anderson

Elena Voss is a technology strategist and AI researcher with over a decade of experience in smart systems.

Fair Vision Smart

Type to search articles.